Thursday, November 11, 2010


Sun gods feel Sorrow
For fields fallow
birds look past fall
and falling lives
and ripen
the sagging tits
of whore earth mother
who sucked the meat
from the fox skull
who grinned at the storm
half a sky away
in fields under neath sun

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

A Good Anarchist....


Berkman did not wait till we reached the café. "A good anarchist," he began with deep conviction, "is one who lives only for the Cause and gives everything to it. My friend here " --- he indicated Fedya --- "is still too much of a bourgeois to realize that. He is a mamenkin sin (mother's spoilt darling), who even accepts money from home." He continued to explain why it was inconsistent for a revolutionary to have anything to do with his bourgeois parents or relatives. His only reason for tolerating his friend Fedya's inconsistency, he added, was that he gave most of what he received from home to the movement. "If I'd let him, he'd spend all his money on useless things -'beautiful,' he calls them. Wouldn't you, Fedya?" He turned to his friend, patting him on the back affectionately.

You are disgusting or Shame is my Shelter.


"A person having no shame is an imperfect faithful or imperfect Imani. Anyone who does not have the above said three virtues in Life, can be assured that the Faith has not touched the heart of that person. Shame is the Shelter of Man. Having Shame in life results in all fault being covered by the Shelter of Shame. Always consider this principle: THE LESSER THE SHAME, THE LESSER THE FAITH.Anyone may be at fault and if he is ashamed of it, nobody shall point out his faults. Anyone who makes a mistake, and feels ashamed of it,and repents for the mistakes being committed will result in all his faults being covered."

Word of the Day: Heterodox


What a great term. I first ran across it in the book called an unnatural history of satan.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterodoxy

Thursday, November 4, 2010

"I will work harder"


As the first original piece of this project, I would like to explore the merits, if there are any, of a constant move towards becoming a better militant. Was Alexander Berkman right to criticize his comrades for even the merest excess that could have gone to the movement? Is this useful thinking, or does it over emphasize the role of one individual and create an air of elitism that will discourage mass involvement? Any comments or insights are welcome.

Connected, I am also looking forward to finishing a piece on the role of the militant, and a libertarian concept of elitism, summarized as striving towards group success and betterment, advancing what is strong and shoring up what is weak.

Solidarity is thicker than Blood!

We are not victims if we fight back, we are Soldiers.


http://militaryhistory.about.com/b/2007/04/18/jews-fight-back-in-warsaw.htm

Body

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05uc5GWQ8Ok

No Monopoly on Violence or Insanity


http://www.adherents.com/misc/hsk.html

It's Miss Anthropy to you


This a record of an attempt to reconcile an extremely negative outlook on life with a belief in left wing political ideology. Typically this incestuous grappling births an ugly contradiction. But perhaps there is a path to liberation illuminated darkly. A place where order is better than chaos, the collective is better than the individual, discipline is better than freedom and the knives of the oppressed are being sharpened.


Good luck!